However, for those who do not mind these weak points, they probably prefer the 44 Magnum. While the cartridge produces around 1200 ft/lbs of energy, which is more than a .44 Magnum, it also has less recoil. No groundbreaking revelation here: The smaller cartridge is also the more affordable one. I would never use a hollow point in a 357 to hunt deer. I would bear in mind that PA. whitetails can get to be pretty big. 150-160 ish. Each hunter will use these cartridges for their hunting purpose and the way they shoot their targets. The .44 Magnum’s raison d'etre has always been medium and large game hunting. When, in 1935, Smith & Wesson launched the .357 Magnum, it created a phenomenon. I've taken it out to use but never pulled the trigger on one with that round. I only broke one , bc I was shooting at close range out of a taller tree stand. It can also shoot the .38 special which is in my opinion more suitabe for defense, while the .357 will suffice as a hunting round. I think Colorado requires 550? Aflați mai multe despre modul în care utilizăm informațiile dvs. Not because it boasts superior ballistics or accuracy, or necessarily because it is less … Are .44 specials something I could handload as a cheap and reduced power option? 3) While .44 Magnum can definitely be “too much” handgun for most self-defense applications, you can carry a “reasonable” sized revolver with excellent .44 Special self-defense loads. 357 Magnum ammo is more readily available as well, a testament to its greater popularity. But under 50 yards, it's still going to take a deer down. Magnum … Originally I was dead set on the .357 for versatility’s sake. In this video, I go hunting with my .357 Magnum revolver. Others use the hunt to feed their families. Then I measured the distance from the bullseye to the center of the group to get a general idea of how far the bullets drop at that distance. Informații despre dispozitivul dvs. Am I better served by a .44 mag? I much prefer being close to the animal I’m hunting, even if it means having to pass up some shots. Don't know what kinda ammo. On elk I would want .44. 3. However, both the .357 magnum and .44 magnum have about twice the kinetic energy when fired from a rifle, making them a MUCH safer bet for clean kills. And why is the 357 Mag more popular? That isn't true, but neither is it … Besides bullet placement, the type of bullet makes a world of difference. I was surprised that my big buck ran 120 yards even though my shot placement and bullet performance was excellent. The .357 Remington Maximum is a very efficient cartridge for hunters of medium game animals like deer and hogs. I cannot speak to hunting deer with a .357. 4. Puteți selecta „Administrare setări” pentru a afla mai multe informații și a vă gestiona opțiunile. Using both 4" K frames and 6" N frames. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. I would like to purchase a .357 magnum rifle, possibly a Marlin model 1894 which should be good to at least 100 -125 yards with a decent scope and proper ammunition. I usually use low end magnum level loads. Other than wildcats, the 357 magnum was the most powerful handgun in the world until the 44 magnum in 1955. Critics often view hunting as a means to kill animals for fun or sport. How much of that statement is accurate? I imagine practicing with 9mm is also going to be substantially cheaper. Magnum and 30-30 (when you want to find out these advantages and disadvantages as well). It may come up to about 600 ft. Lb. The.357 Mag cartridges are nothing less; they also perform well. 75 yards, iron sights, one shot, Especially with underwood now around .357 will do well on whitetail. What’s your experience handloading the .44? One doe went about 70 yards before falling over dead, one doe went about 50 yards before falling over dead, and the other … .44 special would do the same thing I’m guessing, but the price of factory ammo was intimidating when I first looked at it. I recently got an email from Taurusabout one of their newer lines of big bore However I picked up a book on deer hunting today that contained this passage, and it’s got me thinking twice: ”Though many states allow for use of the .357, it lacks sufficient energy for consistent clean kills. Just from my memory I seem to recall he had around 20 kills or so with the .357 Magnum. Breaking both might have helped, but can't say from personal experience. It is not easy to compare the 44. I hunt with open sights on mine, because I don't want to be tempted to push shots to further distances. Perhaps, the 44. This indicates what we already knew: The 44 magnum is much more powerful than the 357 magnum. Today, only very low pressure revolver ammo is factory loaded, in deference to tort lawyers and the many antique .44-40 guns out there. Initial cost of reloading is expensive because of the dies, brass, shell holder and powder and bullets. prin utilizarea modulelor cookie și a tehnologiilor similare și vor prelucra datele dvs. But what about a good 170 grain SWC moving at 1,300 fps from the .357? Maybe that’s old fashioned, but it’s what I enjoy. On The Podcast “Hunt Talk Radio - Randy Newberg Unfiltered” Episode 81, Randy has a guest on the show Todd Orr, he is an exclusive handgun hunter, has harvested something like 30 Elk with his revolver. I don't think I have ever heard the debate of the .44 Special vs the .357 Magnum on whitetail deer. Ruger makes a 5.5 inch barreled convertible version that ships with an extra 9mm cylinder, so you get a package that can shoot 9mm, .38 specials and .357 loads. However, both times they ran between 75 and 100yds. If I hand load some real powerhouse “Ruger only” loads, does that statement still hold true? Part of the appeal of the .357 was being able to use 9mm or .38 not just to save cost, but for the reduced recoil while practicing. At first i thought i had missed breaking the front shoulder, but i actually had. Mostly because most everyone I read thought it was a better deer caliber than the 357 or any other..Also a number of sites mentioned the "crack" of the 357 max saying it will kill your ear drums..Need to mention that I hunt southern N. H. and can only use....357 , 10mm , 41 ,44… As for bullet energy, the 357 comes out at 566 ft-lbs while the 44 creates 832 & 904 ft-lbs. However, there used to be a Hi-Speed hunting load for use in rifles. .357 will do the job just fine. And those bullets make BIG holes. Heavier weights are better for elk, moose, and larger bears. I shot a deer with my .357 with Federal soft points, and it left a hole you could have fit a roll of quarters through. Am I going to have to realistically trim down .44 magnum cases to do it? I used 158gr hollow points out of my 686+ 7in. Magnum and the 30-30 – it is hard to compare. Gun: Taurus Tracker, model 627, 6.5" barrelAmmo: PMC Bronze 158 grain JSP⬇️⬇️⬇️ GEAR I USE! în Politica noastră de confidențialitate și în Politica privind modulele cookie. If you want to shoot deer at longer ranges, a .44 would probably be better. Although fairly powerful, the recoil of a.357 Magnum is manageable for an experienced shooter due to the cartridge being lighter than a.44 Magnum..44 Recoil The.44 Magnum has higher recoil action than the.357 due to the heavier cartridge weight and the increased diameter of the barrel. My only concern is stopping power and would like to know if anyone has any experience hunting with a .357 Mag rifle. generally, rounds designed for use against humans use lighter bullets and generate less energy than those designed for hunting. The .44 Special with good handloads and the right bullet will drop a deer. Ive not loaded 44s special but i know i have loads for it in my manuals. Faceți clic aici pentru a afla mai multe despre partenerii noștri. This is because the ammunition is not quite as potent as it once was. Don't get me wrong the 357 can take deer, and I've done it a few times, but I would shoot the 44. Also would likely use it for Wild Hog someday, although they aren’t endemic here like they are down south. 357 Mag vs. 44 Mag: Takeaway. I know, the .44-40 has probably killed more deer than anything except the .30-30. For each of the 10 loads, I fired groups from the bench at 50, 100, 150, and 200 yards. The .357 is well suited for a defensive, as well as hunting firearm. The .44 is a bit powerful for self defense, but the 44 magnum can also shoot the .44 special, which will be plenty adequete for defense. Give it a listen, you might find some valuable stories and information on that episode. I dislike how he presented it just as his chronograph velocity differences. Hunting with the .357 Remington Maximum. .45 Colt level loads on up. Most handguns used for this purpose have at least a six-inch long barrel. Vă puteți modifica opțiunile în orice moment, vizitând Controale de confidențialitate. Most people who hunt with a .44 Magnum choose 240 grain bullets for deer sized animals and black bear. I'm new to Contenders and haven't hunted with one yet but did a lot of research online , at a bunch of gun & hunting sites , before I purchased and went for the 44 mag . The beauty of .44 Magnum is that your shot will ALWAYS be a passthrough shot on white-tailed deer when you shoot 240 grain softpoints. I have been hunting deer with .44 magnums since the 1990's here in Illinois. Hunters love the chase and take the opportunity to enjoy the outdoors. In the 357 Magnum vs. 44 Magnum, it has been seen that a.44 Mag transfer greater energy into the target than a.357 Mag even when it is fired from a distance of 100 yards. It doesn't get the penetration needed to rip up organs if it hits a bone. The 357 Magnum (also known as .357 S&W Magnum) was developed around 1934 by Elmer Keith, Phil Sharpe, and the Smith & Wesson firearm manufacturers. With comparable loads, the .41 Magnum can do anything the .44 Magnum can do, and it is a real survivor. .44-40 Winchester - Notably underpowered compared to the .357 Magnum. And very often there is a perception that, somehow, magnum equals better. However, by about 1950, shooters with .357 Magnum revolvers started buying old Winchester Model 92 and Marlin 1894 carbines and having them re-barreled for the .357 revolver cartridge. 357 Magnum vs 44 Magnum: A Brief History. It's not a rifle round. Ft lbs at 50 yards and a hollow point, which only the very hottest underwood/buffalo bore loads will meet in 357, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Used for hunting, target shooting, and self-defense, the .357 Magnum remains a common sight at gun ranges and hunting grounds across the country..357 Magnum Quick Facts: Released: 1935; Bullet Diameter: .357 inches; Base Diameter: .379 inches; Neck Diameter: .379 inches; Case Length: 1.29 inches; Commonly used in revolvers; Getting to Know the 10mm Auto That’s the first test I performed. People say it lacks energy... Sure. The .44 Magnum is a fraud, being a .429 in true caliber, while the .41 Magnum is the real McCoy. Although I wouldn't sight it in with a 9 and switch to .357 just for hunting. Indeed, I was planning on sticking to irons and keeping most shots to within archery distance. Most enjoy the experience even if they never capture their prey. I know that handgun hunting is more challenging than using a long gun, but am honestly looking forward to the endeavor. It's not even a .44 magnum. At that point, the only advantage of .357 Magnum is that comparable revolvers are … My previous intuition was that larger calibers were no substitute for shot placement with a handgun. The 44. I’ve had my eyes set on either a Ruger Blackhawk or Super Blackhawk single action for this purpose. So which of these two is better? Today, the .357 magnum is considered by many to be about the bare minimum for hunting deer with a handgun. If you want to shoot deer at longer ranges, a .44 would probably be better. .357 Magnum vs .44 Magnum Bullet Trajectory. I've shot two smaller does with my 357mag. I heard a discussion the other day about handgun deer hunting, surrounding the .357 Magnum and if it was enough of a pistol caliber for whitetails. Parents should train children on all aspects of hunting before going out into t… If you're content with taking archery-distance shots, then a .357 is a fine choice. They found that these made lightweight, handy, short range carbines for hunting small predators and deer. Should have had a graph for 357 drop with handgun in dotted line and solid line in a rifle, then done the same with 44 magnum. A .357 would be a better defense weapon against a bear than throwing rocks at it... but wait, the last grizzly that woofed and clicked his teeth at me, I fired two shots over his head with my .44 magnum that didn't phase him, so I picked up a baseball size rock which I … 357 Magnum vs 44 Magnum: Price. the 44 magnum is more powerful than the 357 magnum. Thanks for the feedback! In the long run it does become cheaper. If the price of ammo is what has you leaning away from the 44 try handloading them. Hunting related news and personal stories. 45 colt has never in it's history been the most powerful handgun. But loading specials you wont use much powder, brass can be used more than once, and the dies and shell holder are a one time purchase. Many hunters consider the action as an enjoyable way to get outdoors. Using the 9 as a baseline is a pretty good idea, but put a few hunting rounds through it to make sure it's on before you use it in the field. What I love about the .44 is it's versatility. The rest of the "magnum" craze is history. Experts advise seasoned shooters to take great precautions when training younger adults to hunt and handle weapons. At 100 yards, which is amazing stopping power. Nowadays, specialized hunting handguns often sport much longer tubes, in … Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I believe the Colt Walker held that designation all the way up to the 357 magnum. Since it's been over a decade since I've shot a deer over 35 yards, it works great for me. I’m looking into picking up a hunting revolver for the upcoming deer season. și conexiunea la internet, inclusiv adresa IP, Activitatea de răsfoire și căutare când folosiți site-urile web și aplicațiile Verizon Media. Some that have taken deer for me are as follows, all with Keith boolits: 18.5 2400, 20.0 2400, 22.0 IMR 4227, … Is it an easy cartridge to handload and reload? I've killed a few deer with a 357 Magnum. I have a relative who has a mushroomed .357 mag that was stuck in opposite side hide of a big buck. 2) .357 Magnum is wholly inadequate for ethical large game hunting and reliable self-defense against elk, moose, and bears in excess of 400 pounds. Round did its job and left a nasty hole both times. cu caracter personal, pentru a afișa conținut și reclame personalizate, pentru măsurarea eficienței reclamelor și a conținutului, pentru statistici despre public și pentru dezvoltarea de produse. I’m already comfortable with the limitations that archery hunting places upon me and view this as a similar challenge. The introduction of the .44 Remington Magnum revolver cartridge in 1955, undeniably an effective deer … Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. Dacă faceți clic pe „Acceptați tot”, sunteți de acord că Verizon Media și partenerii noștri vor stoca și/sau vor accesa informații pe dispozitivul dvs. If you're content with taking archery-distance shots, then a .357 is a fine choice. I … Indeed, I was planning on sticking to irons and keeping most shots to within archery distance. One of the guys I used to hunt with shot one with his 2-1/2" .357 magnum. Killed a bunch with the .44 magnum but not the .357.
Can You Send Links In Ebay Messages,
Merle Allin Website,
Is Cesium Phosphate Soluble In Water,
Karyotype Test At Home,
Aglaonema Seeds Propagation,
Pollo Tropical Picadillo Calories,